Blair v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Ry.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Blair v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Ry.

89 A. 140, 111 Me. 586, 1913 Me. LEXIS 145

DecidedDecember 30, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 89 A. 140 (Blair v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Ry.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blair v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Ry., 89 A. 140, 111 Me. 586, 1913 Me. LEXIS 145 (Me. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

The only question involved is whether the verdict for the plaintiff is excessive. The court is of opinion that the evidence did not warrant a verdict for $2,234.66, and that $1200 is the limit beyond which it ought not to be allowed to stand. If the plaintiff within 30 days after the certificate is received remits all of the verdict in excess of $1200, motion overruled; otherwise, motion sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The only question involved is whether the verdict for the plaintiff is excessive. The court is of opinion that the evidence did not warrant a verdict for $2,234.66, and that $1200 is the limit beyond which it ought not to be allowed to stand. If the plaintiff within 30 days after the certificate is received remits all of the verdict in excess of $1200, motion overruled; otherwise, motion sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A. 140, 111 Me. 586, 1913 Me. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blair-v-lewiston-augusta-waterville-street-ry-me-1913.