Blair v. Lefler

276 S.W. 847, 210 Ky. 772, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 772
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
DecidedOctober 27, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 276 S.W. 847 (Blair v. Lefler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blair v. Lefler, 276 S.W. 847, 210 Ky. 772, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 772 (Ky. 1925).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Olay

Affirming.

■Charles O. Lefler, as citizen and taxpayer, and also as justice of the peace for the fifth magisterial district of *773 Boyd county, brought this suit to have the 1924 reapportionment of the justices ’ districts in that county declared void. Prom a judgment granting the relief prayed for this appeal is prosecuted..

Power to reapportion the justices’ districts is conferred on the county courts, sections 1079 to 1082, inclusive, Kentucky Statutes, but the court is without jurisdiction to act unless notice of the proposed application for the reapportionment be given by written or printed notices posted >at the courthouse door and in three or more public places in each justice’s district of the county, at least twenty days before the term of court at which the application for the appointment of commissioners is made. Section 1082, supra; Wilson, County Judge v. Dean, 177 Ky. 97, 197 S. W. 547. It is admitted that the notice of the proposed application was posted on a telephone pole forty feet away from the courthouse door. It is at once apparent that this is too far away to be “at the courthouse door ’ ’ within the meaning of the statute. To comply with the statute the notice must be posted on the door, or on the wall, or on a bulletin board, or a post, or ■some other object within a reasonable distance of the door. As the notice was not properly posted, it follows that the county court did not acquire jurisdiction. That being true, the order of reapportionment is void, and the ■court did not err in so holding.

Judgment affirmed;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

East v. Bell
557 S.W.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1977)
Caldwell v. State
126 S.W.2d 654 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 S.W. 847, 210 Ky. 772, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blair-v-lefler-kyctapphigh-1925.