Blair v. Kijakazi

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided December 14, 2022·No. Civil Action No. 2021-3089·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SAMANTHA BLAIR o/b/o S.T.,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 21-cv-3089-ZMF KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Plaintiff Samantha Blair’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal and Remand, see Pl.’s Mot. for J., ECF No. 19, on behalf of her minor son S.T., and the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance, see Def.’s Mot. for J. of Affirmance, ECF No. 20, and Pl.’s Reply in Opp’n to Def.’s Mot., see ECF No. 23, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand of Judgment is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Affirmance of Judgment is DENIED.

Digitally signed by Zia M.

Faruqui

Date: 2022.12.14 16:13:15 Date: December 14, 2022 -05'00'

ZIA M. FARUQUI

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blair v. Kijakazi, (D.D.C. 2022).

Blair v. Kijakazi (Blair v. Kijakazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.