Blair v. Kelly

68 A.D.3d 1814, 890 N.Y.2d 840

This text of 68 A.D.3d 1814 (Blair v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blair v. Kelly, 68 A.D.3d 1814, 890 N.Y.2d 840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendants appeal from an order that, inter alia, granted that part of plaintiffs motion to compel disclosure of certain medical records of Joseph R. Kelly (decedent). Although we agree with plaintiff that decedent’s medical condition at the time of the accident is “ ‘in controversy’ within the meaning of CPLR 3121 (a)” (Dillenbeck v Hess, 73 NY2d 278, 286 [1989]; see also Koump v Smith, 25 NY2d 287 [1969]), we further conclude that those records are exempt from disclosure inasmuch as defendant Donna S. Kelly, as executrix of decedent’s estate, did not waive the physician-patient privilege “either by way of counterclaim or as a defense to the plaintiffs claim” (Koump, 25 NY2d at 295; see Dillenbeck, 73 NY2d at 278). We therefore reverse the order. Present — Scudder, EJ., Hurlbutt, Smith and Centra, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koump v. Smith
250 N.E.2d 857 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
Dillenbeck v. Hess
536 N.E.2d 1126 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 1814, 890 N.Y.2d 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blair-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2009.