Blair v. Gray

104 U.S. 769, 26 L. Ed. 922, 1881 U.S. LEXIS 2074
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 18, 1882
Docket207
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 104 U.S. 769 (Blair v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blair v. Gray, 104 U.S. 769, 26 L. Ed. 922, 1881 U.S. LEXIS 2074 (1882).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The charter of .the Republic Life Insurance -Company of Chicago contains tbe following section: —

“ Sect. 6. The real and.personal property of each individual stockholder shall be held liable for any and all liabilities of -the company, to the amount ofstock subscribed and held by him and not actually *770 paid in. In all cases of losses exceeding the means of the corporation, each stockholder shall be held liable to the amount of unpaid stock held by him.”

The defendant, Gray, subscribed $10,000 to the capital stock of the company. He. has paid only $2,000 on his subscription, and still owes the company for the rest. Under the foregoing section of the charter some appropriate action for the benefit of ■ creditors may undoubtedly.be maintained against him for the , recovery of this unpaid balance, if the losses of the company áre in excess of its means.

This suit was at law by a policy-holder of the .company, against the defendant as a stockholder, to recover an amount claimed to be'.due on the policy. There is no averment in the declaration to the effect that the losses of the company, or its liabilities, exceed its assets. The. case stands on demurrer to the- declaration. Without, therefore, determining whether, ■under the decisions of the courts of Illinois, if it appeared that there was a deficiency of assets, an action like this might be maintained, .we affirm the judgment below, because we are all of opinion that, until such contingency arises, a creditor cannot sue a stockholder to enforce this liability.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fourth Nat. Bank of NY v. Francklyn
120 U.S. 747 (Supreme Court, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 U.S. 769, 26 L. Ed. 922, 1881 U.S. LEXIS 2074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blair-v-gray-scotus-1882.