Blair v. Comm'r
This text of 2017 T.C. Memo. 153 (Blair v. Comm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appropriate orders and decisions will be entered.
FOLEY,
Petitioner did not file a 2008, 2009, 2010, or 2011 Federal income tax return. In 2009 petitioner received wages of $63,435 from Molycorp Minerals, LLC, and $4,266 from Chevron Mining, Inc., and dividends of $63 from Chevron Corp. In 2011 petitioner received wages of $67,584 from Molycorp Minerals, LLC, and dividends of $74 from Chevron Corp. Respondent prepared substitutes for returns (SFRs) relating to 2009 and 2011. In notices of deficiency dated June 17, 2014, respondent determined deficiencies of $10,394 and $10,669 relating to 2009 and 2011, respectively. In addition, respondent determined that petitioner was liable for
At the beginning of the December 14, 2016, trial in Las Vegas, Nevada, the Court stated that it would be inclined*152 to impose penalties if petitioner made *155 frivolous contentions. Petitioner failed to heed the Court's warning, and respondent moved for the imposition of
Petitioner contends that he has no Federal income tax liability but concedes that he received the wages and dividends at issue.3 Accordingly, we sustain the determined deficiencies. We also sustain the determined additions to tax. Respondent established that petitioner failed to file returns or pay the amounts shown on the 2009 and 2011 SFRs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 T.C. Memo. 153, 114 T.C.M. 177, 2017 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blair-v-commr-tax-2017.