Blaine v. Marmor
555 So. 2d 1241, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2662, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6393, 1989 WL 136151
This text of 555 So. 2d 1241 (Blaine v. Marmor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blaine v. Marmor, 555 So. 2d 1241, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2662, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6393, 1989 WL 136151 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
As the record shows that appellant is a stranger to the note as to which he seeks to recover allegedly usurious payments, dismissal of plaintiff’s action is affirmed. See Nesbitt v. Citicorp Savings, 514 So.2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nesbitt v. Citicorp Savings of Florida
514 So. 2d 371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
555 So. 2d 1241, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2662, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6393, 1989 WL 136151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blaine-v-marmor-fladistctapp-1989.