Blahut v. State
This text of 34 Ark. 447 (Blahut v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, William Blahut, was indicted, together with J. Blahut, for Sabbath-breaking by keeping open a dram-shop on Sunday. They severed. William Blahut was tried by a jury, convicted, fined, denied a new trial, and then appealed, on the ground that the evidence did not support the verdict.
It tended to show that appellant was a nominal partner in a saloon, and one of the bar-tenders. For a year before the indictment it had been the habit to close the front door of the saloon on Sunday, and leave unfastened a back door, through which persons might, and did, come to buy drinks. Appellant and another bar-tender attended by turns on Sunday to furnish the liquor.
This, if true, constituted the offense of keeping open a dram-shop. The jury were proper judges of the weight of the evidence.
Affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Ark. 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blahut-v-state-ark-1879.