Blagrove v. Smith

701 So. 2d 584, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11520, 1997 WL 629063
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 1997
DocketNo. 97-2407
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 701 So. 2d 584 (Blagrove v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blagrove v. Smith, 701 So. 2d 584, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11520, 1997 WL 629063 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Karlynn Blagrove, plaintiff in a personal injury action involving an automobile accident, seeks certiorari review of an interlocutory order granting respondent James Smith’s request for independent examinations in Tampa, Florida. Plaintiff objected to respondent’s request on the basis that Her-nando County is where the action is pending and the site of the accident, as well as her residence and where her medical providers are located.

Plaintiff seeks damages for physical and non-physical injuries she received as a result of the automobile accident. Respondent therefore has good cause for requesting independent examinations pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.360. See Dominique v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 642 So.2d 594 (Fla. 4th 1994 DCA), rev. den., 651 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995).

The request for an independent examination must specify a reasonable place. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.360(a)(1)(A). This case is distinguishable from Tsutras v. Duhe, 685 So.2d 979 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) where this court quashed an order requiring a nonresident plaintiff from Virginia to travel to Florida to submit to independent examinations. As Hernando County and Hillsborough County are geographically close to one another, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that respondent’s request was reasonable. Cf. McKenney v. Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc., 686 So.2d 771 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Because the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law, the petition for certiorari is denied.

PETITION DENIED.

W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scales v. Swill
715 So. 2d 1059 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 So. 2d 584, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11520, 1997 WL 629063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blagrove-v-smith-fladistctapp-1997.