Blagden v. Broadrup
30 F. Cas. 966, 2 Hayw. & H.D.C. 278, 1857 U.S. App. LEXIS 668
This text of 30 F. Cas. 966 (Blagden v. Broadrup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blagden v. Broadrup, 30 F. Cas. 966, 2 Hayw. & H.D.C. 278, 1857 U.S. App. LEXIS 668 (circtddc 1857).
Opinion
decided that the ease had been improperly taken out of the hands of the magistrates, and that they would issue the procedendo, but requested the motion might be presented to them by way of a writ of error .cum nobis.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 F. Cas. 966, 2 Hayw. & H.D.C. 278, 1857 U.S. App. LEXIS 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blagden-v-broadrup-circtddc-1857.