Bladen County v. . Squires

14 S.E.2d 665, 219 N.C. 649, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 121
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 21, 1941
StatusPublished

This text of 14 S.E.2d 665 (Bladen County v. . Squires) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bladen County v. . Squires, 14 S.E.2d 665, 219 N.C. 649, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 121 (N.C. 1941).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Stevens occupied the position of a preferred bidder with no rights in the property in law or equity until his bid had been accepted and confirmed by the court, at least untiL after the time for upset bids had expired. A subsequent order of resale within the time permitted for upset bids is a rejection of the original bid and the bidder is not entitled to contest the validity of the judgment of confirmation. Vance v. Vance, 203 N. C., 667, 166 S. E., 901; Richmond County v. Simmons, 209 N. C., 250, 183 S. E., 282. The court had authority to reject the bid and to order a resale in the absence of exceptions or an increase bid. Sec. 1719 (r), ch. 310, Public Laws 1939. Even if it be conceded (and it is not) that the appellant has a sufficient interest to entitle him to be heard, the facts found by the court below are supported by evidence and sustain the judgment entered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richmond County v. . Simmons
183 S.E. 282 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Vance v. . Vance
166 S.E. 901 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 S.E.2d 665, 219 N.C. 649, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bladen-county-v-squires-nc-1941.