Blackwood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Blackwood v. State

842 S.W.2d 695, 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 236, 1992 WL 367514

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 16, 1992

DocketNo. 941-91

StatusPublished

This text of 842 S.W.2d 695 (Blackwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blackwood v. State, 842 S.W.2d 695, 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 236, 1992 WL 367514 (Tex. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

[696]*696OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was surety on a bond for Ronald Lynn Nash. The trial court ordered the bond forfeited and entered a final judgment against appellant and others in the amount of $110,645. This judgment was affirmed. Nash v. State, 811 S.W.2d 698 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1991).

Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review of this opinion. The petition was granted October 16, 1991, to determine the effect of Matyastik v. State, 811 S.W.2d 102 (Tex.Cr.App.1991), on the validity of Article 22.16(a), V.A.C.C.P. Appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss his petition. We grant appellant’s motion.

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI