Blackwell v. . Wright

74 N.C. 733
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1876
StatusPublished

This text of 74 N.C. 733 (Blackwell v. . Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackwell v. . Wright, 74 N.C. 733 (N.C. 1876).

Opinion

Bynum J.

This case was decided at the last term of the court, and is reported in 73 N. C. Rep. 310, and it is again before us on a petition to re-hear for alleged error in the former decision. The alleged error consists in this, that the *734 court in the opinion and judgment then rendered, assumed that the defendant, Wright, was a citizen of North Carolina, and doing business in the town of Durham, when in fact he w’as not.

It is true that the court did so assume, and the record, to which we are confined, does not show otherwise. But it is immaterial how that fact may be, as the opinion of the court was not affected by that consideration. The decision rests upon the broad ground that the trade mark of the plaintiff, was not infringed upon by that of the defendant, owing to their dissimilarity. It was therefore not material whether the defendant was located and doing business at Durham or at Richmond.

There is no error.

Pee Curiam:. Judgment re-affirmed and petition , dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blackwell v. . Wright
73 N.C. 310 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 N.C. 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackwell-v-wright-nc-1876.