Blackwell v. State

45 S.W.3d 502, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 614, 2001 WL 345626
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 2001·No. No. ED 77906·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Leroy Blackwell, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29 .151 motion. We have previously affirmed Movant’s convictions for first degree burglary under section 569.160, armed criminal action under section 571.015, unlawful use of a weapon under section 571.030.1(1), resisting arrest under section 575.150, and possession of a controlled substance under section 195.202. State v. Blackwell, 978 S.W.2d 475 (Mo.App.1998).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackwell v. State, 45 S.W.3d 502, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 614, 2001 WL 345626 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

45 S.W.3d 502 (Blackwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Blackwell
978 S.W.2d 475 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)