Blackwell v. State

944 So. 2d 538, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21452, 2006 WL 3750135
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 22, 2006
DocketNo. 5D05-4441
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 944 So. 2d 538 (Blackwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackwell v. State, 944 So. 2d 538, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21452, 2006 WL 3750135 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fitzpatrick v. State, 900 So.2d 495, 517-18 (Fla.2005) (holding that the test for suppression of an out-of-court identification is (i) whether the police used an unnecessarily suggestive procedure to obtain the out-of-court identification; and (ii) if so, considering all the circumstances, whether the suggestive procedure gave rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentifieation).

THOMPSON, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Justice v. State
944 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
944 So. 2d 538, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21452, 2006 WL 3750135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackwell-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.