Blackwell v. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford

67 S.E.2d 750, 234 N.C. 559, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 513

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Issuance of the policy and loss as claimed were admitted, but defendants denied liability on the ground that the loss occurred while the insured was transporting in the automobile intoxicating liquor in violation of law and endeavoring to escape arrest. However, the policy contains no exception on this ground, and as the loss comes within the terms of the insurance policy, as issued and paid for, this defense will not avail the defendants. Poole v. Ins. Co., 188 N.C. 468, 125 S.E. 8. The insurance contract had no direct connection with the violation of law admitted, but was only collateral thereto. Electrova Co. v. Ins. Co., 156 N.C. 232, 72 S.E. 306; 29 A.J. 208. The insurance here cannot be said to have promoted the unlawful act referred to. 132 A.L.R. 126.

There was no evidence of loss by intentional act of the insured. Nor does the statement of facts show misrepresentation in the plaintiffs’ declarations on which the policy was issued.

Judgment affirmed.