Blackwell v. Lurie (In re Popkin & Stern)

305 F. App'x 543
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 2004
DocketNo. 03-2469
StatusPublished

This text of 305 F. App'x 543 (Blackwell v. Lurie (In re Popkin & Stern)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackwell v. Lurie (In re Popkin & Stern), 305 F. App'x 543 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case arises from the bankruptcy filing of the Popkin & Stern law firm. Ronald Lurie was a general and managing partner of the firm. The bankruptcy trustee obtained a deficiency judgment against Ronald. The Lurie’s assets included a painting, “Apache Renegades,” liquidated for $203,059. Ronald’s wife, Nancy Fendell Lurie, and her two sons, Michael Lurie and Ryan Lurie, contested the valuation of the ownership interests in the proceeds from the painting’s sale. The bankruptcy court concluded Ronald and Nancy jointly owned an 87.4% interest in the painting, and awarded Nancy 43.7% of the net proceeds from the painting’s sale. The court found Michael and Ryan had no ownership interest in the painting. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirmed. In re Popkin & Stern, 292 B.R. 910 (E.D.Mo.2003). Nancy, Michael, and Ryan Lurie appeal. Having carefully considered the record, the briefs, and the applicable law, we affirm on the basis of the BAP’s thorough, published opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lurie v. Blackwell (In Re Popkin & Stern)
292 B.R. 910 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 F. App'x 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackwell-v-lurie-in-re-popkin-stern-ca8-2004.