Blackwell v. Hawkins
207 N.C. 874
Opinion
Affirmed on authority of the principles announced in Hinnant v. R. R., 202 N. C., 489, 163 S. E., 555.
The case of Dickey v. R. R., 196 N. C., 726, 147 S. E., 15, is distinguishable in that the defendant’s train was there blocking the street in violation of a town ordinance.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blackwell v. Hawkins, 207 N.C. 874 (N.C. 1935).
207 N.C. 874 (Blackwell v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morris v. Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Co.
144 S.E.2d 598 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. v. Swindell
139 F.2d 71 (Fourth Circuit, 1943)
Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Switzer
122 S.W.2d 967 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1938)