Blackwell v. Duling

1937 OK 27, 64 P.2d 712, 179 Okla. 85, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 692
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 26, 1937·No. No. 26578.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 29th day of August, 1935, plaintiff in error filed his petition in error with ease-made attached and on October 28, 1935', filed a brief which reason-ab.y supports the allegations in the petition in error. No brief has been filed by the defendant in error, nor has any excuse been offered for such failure. Under such circumstances we have held that it is not the duty of this court to examine the cause further. The cause is therefore reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the ordei entered for the plaintiff and to enter judg ment for the defendant denying the injunction and dismissing the cause.

OSBORN, C. J., and WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, and HURST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackwell v. Duling, 1937 OK 27, 64 P.2d 712, 179 Okla. 85, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 692 (Okla. 1937).

1937 OK 27 (Blackwell v. Duling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Janakiev v. Robertson
34 Va. Cir. 523 (Winchester County Circuit Court, 1991)
C & C Tile Co. v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 7 of Tulsa Cty.
1972 OK 137 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1972)