Blackstone v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Blackstone v. State

30 S.E.2d 838, 71 Ga. App. 369, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 372

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 28, 1944

Docket30577.

StatusPublished

This text of 30 S.E.2d 838 (Blackstone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blackstone v. State, 30 S.E.2d 838, 71 Ga. App. 369, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 372 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted in the criminal court of Pulton County of operating a lottery known as the “number game,” for the hazarding of money. In view of the stipulation entered into by counsel for both parties, and the evidence adduced, the judge, sitting without a jury, was authorized to find the defendant guilty of the offense charged. None of the rulings complained of in the petition for cetiorari show cause for a new trial. The overruling of the certiorari was not error. Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted in the criminal court of Pulton County of operating a lottery known as the “number game,” for the hazarding of money. In view of the stipulation entered into by counsel for both parties, and the evidence adduced, the judge, sitting without a jury, was authorized to find the defendant guilty of the offense charged. None of the rulings complained of in the petition for cetiorari show cause for a new trial. The overruling of the certiorari was not error. Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 S.E.2d 838, 71 Ga. App. 369, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackstone-v-state-gactapp-1944.