Blackstone Holding Co. v. Lawrence
This text of 192 So. 198 (Blackstone Holding Co. v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In September, 1931, Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company secured a final judgment in a common law action against E. W. Thompson. In October following, execution was placed in the hands of the sheriff with instructions to realize on the judgment. In April, 1932, in an entirely different action, Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company obtained a second judgment against E. W. Thompson, and execution was .placed in the hands of the sheriff as before.
In 1935 and 1936, Blackstone Holding Company secured judgments against E. W. Thompson and likewise placed executions in the hands of the sheriff to collect the judgment. A controversy arose as to which creditor’s judgment should first be satisfied, being limited to personal property. *704 The circuit court held that the lien of the judgment creditor operated and became effective from the date it was placed in the hands of the sheriff for execution.
The lien of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company was first secured and placed in the hands of the sheriff. The court therefore was correct in holding that it should first be satisfied. Love v. Williams, 4 Fla. 126; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Daniel, 72 Fla. 489, 73 So. 592; Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819, 75 So. 30.
Other questions argued by the plaintiff in error have been considered but we think they are all concluded by what we have said.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 So. 198, 140 Fla. 703, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackstone-holding-co-v-lawrence-fla-1939.