Blackston v. Vogrin

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 6, 2010
• Docket: 10-6736
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6736

THEOPHILUS BLACKSTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STEPHEN VOGRIN, Individually and Officially,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:10-cv-00014-REM-JSK)

Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theophilus Blackston, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Theophilus Blackston filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)

complaint alleging that a prosecutor violated his privacy rights

by revealing medical information during the sentencing hearing

in Blackston’s criminal prosecution. A prosecutor is a quasi-

judicial officer who enjoys absolute immunity when performing

prosecutorial functions as an advocate for the state. Imbler v.

Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 430-31 (1976). We therefore affirm the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on Blackston’s complaint.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED