Blackshear v. State

103 S.E. 198, 25 Ga. App. 327, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 783
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1920
Docket11324
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 198 (Blackshear v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackshear v. State, 103 S.E. 198, 25 Ga. App. 327, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 783 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under the particular facts of the case, the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for a continuance; and the further proceedings were nugatory.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. G. C. Bedgood, J. E. Burch, for plaintiff in error. W. C. Davis, solicitor pro tem., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 198, 25 Ga. App. 327, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackshear-v-state-gactapp-1920.