Blackshear v. State

172 So. 3d 515, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11796, 2015 WL 4660222
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 2015·No. No. 5D14-1298·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roderick Blackshear appeals his convictions for burglary of a dwelling with an assault (with a firearm), criminal mischief, aggravated assault with a firearm, and armed trespass in an occupied structure. He raises a number of issues; two have merit. The State requested that the trial court vacate Blackshear’s aggravated assault conviction on double jeopardy principles. While the trial court orally granted the request, it did not enter an amended judgment. The State concedes error.

Likewise, we agree with Blackshear that double jeopardy precludes conviction for both armed burglary of a dwelling with an assault therein and armed trespass in an occupied structure. Therefore, we remand to the court to vacate one of the convictions.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.

LAWSON, C.J., SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackshear v. State, 172 So. 3d 515, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11796, 2015 WL 4660222 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

172 So. 3d 515 (Blackshear v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.