Blackshear v. Santiago

948 N.E.2d 448, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1512
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 8, 2011
Docket2011-0836
StatusPublished

This text of 948 N.E.2d 448 (Blackshear v. Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackshear v. Santiago, 948 N.E.2d 448, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1512 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Nigel Blackshear. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and McGee Brown, JJ., dissent and would order a return on the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
948 N.E.2d 448, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackshear-v-santiago-ohio-2011.