Blackmon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blackmon v. State

655 So. 2d 1315, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6368, 1995 WL 353515

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 14, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2107

StatusPublished

This text of 655 So. 2d 1315 (Blackmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blackmon v. State, 655 So. 2d 1315, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6368, 1995 WL 353515 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the basis that the defendant did not properly preserve for review on appeal his objection to the trial court’s denial of his right to use his peremptory challenges to excuse two jurors. Mitchell v. State, 620 So.2d 1008 (Fla.1993); Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174 (Fla.1993); Schummer v. State, 654 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the basis that the defendant did not properly preserve for review on appeal his objection to the trial court’s denial of his right to use his peremptory challenges to excuse two jurors. Mitchell v. State, 620 So.2d 1008 (Fla.1993); Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174 (Fla.1993); Schummer v. State, 654 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

655 So. 2d 1315, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6368, 1995 WL 353515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackmon-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack