Blackmon v. Head
This text of 737 So. 2d 629 (Blackmon v. Head) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no basis for the trial court’s finding that appehee pled comparative negligence, and no competent substantial evidence supports the court’s findings that appellant knew or should have known ap-pellee-was impaired or that appellee was impaired. Accordingly, the trial court erred in determining that appellant was comparatively neghgent and in reducing appellant’s damage award. We reverse. [630]*630On remand the trial court shall enter judgment for the full amount for appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
737 So. 2d 629, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10062, 1999 WL 533715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackmon-v-head-fladistctapp-1999.