Blackmon v. Feinstein

39 A.D.2d 642, 331 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4860
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 19, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 A.D.2d 642 (Blackmon v. Feinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackmon v. Feinstein, 39 A.D.2d 642, 331 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed, determination confirmed and petition dismissed, all without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner was first employed by respondent director of West Seneca State School on August 19, 1967 and was assigned to work in Ward Six, a special, low I.Q. group of patients with serious physical and mental handicaps, needing elemental assistance. On June 12, 1970 he was suspended on charges of mistreatment of patients, and after a hearing thereon the hearing officer found him guilty of such mistreatment in that he dropped and struck patients and caused one to smoke a cigarette, something particularly harmful to the patient. Petitioner’s guilt of such misconduct is not challenged in this proceeding. In his report the hearing officer recommended that a fine of $50 be imposed upon petitioner. Respondent director reviewed the report and concluded that, "I cannot in conscience impose a lesser penalty than dismissal when abuse of a resident is involved. It is impossible to give proper [643]*643care to helpless and dependent people if abuse is tolerated”; and he dismissed petitioner. Special Term determined that this constituted unreasonable and excessive punishment. Upon this record we find that respondent’s action was supported in fact and was neither arbitrary nor capricious. By no means does it shock the conscience of the court, but, instead, it appears to be a reasonable determination in the best interests of the administration of the School. Special Term erred in annulling that determination and imposing only the fine recommended by the hearing officer. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Special Term, reinstating petitioner, in article 78 proceeding.) Present—Marsh, J. P., Witmer, Moule, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael Romano v. Ivan Canuteson
11 F.3d 1140 (Second Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 A.D.2d 642, 331 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackmon-v-feinstein-nyappdiv-1972.