Blackmon v. Blackmon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blackmon v. Blackmon

466 So. 2d 1276, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 986, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13493

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 1985·No. No. 84-1103·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court held that a final judgment of a court in a foreign jurisdiction, adjudicating and awarding an undivided one-half interest in Florida real property, was not entitled to full faith and credit and could not act in rem upon the title of the property. We affirm. See Fall v. Eastin, 215 U.S. 1, 30 S.Ct. 3, 54 L.Ed. 65 (1909); Schluter v. Schluter, 130 Cal.App. 780, 20 P.2d 723 (1933); Taylor v. Taylor, 192 Cal. 71, 218 P. 756 (1923); Williams v. Williams, 83 Or. 59, 162 P. 834 (1917); Compare Rozan v. Rozan, 49 Cal.2d 322, 317 P.2d 11 (1957).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court held that a final judgment of a court in a foreign jurisdiction, adjudicating and awarding an undivided one-half interest in Florida real property, was not entitled to full faith and credit and could not act in rem upon the title of the property. We affirm. See Fall v. Eastin, 215 U.S. 1, 30 S.Ct. 3, 54 L.Ed. 65 (1909); Schluter v. Schluter, 130 Cal.App. 780, 20 P.2d 723 (1933); Taylor v. Taylor, 192 Cal. 71, 218 P. 756 (1923); Williams v. Williams, 83 Or. 59, 162 P. 834 (1917); Compare Rozan v. Rozan, 49 Cal.2d 322, 317 P.2d 11 (1957).

Affirmed.

Blackmon v. Blackmon, 466 So. 2d 1276, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 986, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13493 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

466 So. 2d 1276 (Blackmon v. Blackmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related