Blackmon v. Blackmon
This text of 466 So. 2d 1276 (Blackmon v. Blackmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court held that a final judgment of a court in a foreign jurisdiction, adjudicating and awarding an undivided one-half interest in Florida real property, was not entitled to full faith and credit and could not act in rem upon the title of the property. We affirm. See Fall v. Eastin, 215 U.S. 1, 30 S.Ct. 3, 54 L.Ed. 65 (1909); Schluter v. Schluter, 130 Cal.App. 780, 20 P.2d 723 (1933); Taylor v. Taylor, 192 Cal. 71, 218 P. 756 (1923); Williams v. Williams, 83 Or. 59, 162 P. 834 (1917); Compare Rozan v. Rozan, 49 Cal.2d 322, 317 P.2d 11 (1957).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 So. 2d 1276, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 986, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackmon-v-blackmon-fladistctapp-1985.