Blackmon-Malloy v. United States Capitol Police Board

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: September 26, 2024
• Docket: Civil Action No. 2001-2221
• Status: Published

Opinion

Appendix D

Plaintiff Civil Action Claim Type Claim Details Disposition 1 Frank Adams 1-2221 (Blackmon- Discrimination More severely disciplined than white officers. See FAC ¶ 68, Not challenged by Defendant. Malloy ) Ex. 10 Discrimination Unfairly denied promotion after the 2000 lieutenant's MTD Denied. examination. See FAC ¶ 54, Ex. 8 HWE Ordered to change negative performance of officer in K-9 Unit MTD Denied. and white officers in other units. See FAC ¶ 30; White management officials allowed, encouraged, and participated in white officer hositilities to try to force him to request assignment to another division and he was involuntarily transfered. See FAC ¶ 30; Subjected to frivolous internal affairs investigations, management refused to investigate his charges. See FAC ¶ 31; Hostile work environment created by racist words. See FAC ¶ 25, Ex. 1; Racist actions. See FAC ¶ 26, Ex. 2; Racist actions or practices. See FAC ¶ 28, Ex. 3; Racially hostile work environment. See FAC¶ 30.

Retaliation Threat of transfer (November 3, 2003) Not challenged by Defendant.

Retaliation Involuntary transfer (November 6, 2003) Not challenged by Defendant.

5-491 (Adams II ) Retaliation Lieutenant with less seniority was promoted Not challenged by Defendant.

Retaliation Denied Captain promotion Not challenged by Defendant.

6-653 (Adams III ) Retaliation Non-selection to Captain position Not challenged by Defendant.

2 Sharon Blackmon- 1-2221 (Blackmon- Discrimination/R Unfairly denied promotion after the 2000 lieutenant's Not challenged by Defendant. Malloy Malloy ) etaliation examination. See FAC ¶ 54, Ex. 8; Alleges her score was lowered. See FAC ¶ 47. 2-1859 (Blackmon- Retaliation Retaliatory exposure to second-hand smoke. MTD Denied. Malloy II ) 3 Larry Ikard 1-2221 (Blackmon- Retaliation Retaliated against [by not being promoted to a K-9 Officer.] Not challenged by Defendant. Malloy ) See FAC ¶ 73, Ex. 11. Appendix D

Discrimination Non-promotion to K-9 Officer position. See FAC ¶ ¶ 18-20, 25, MTD Denied. Ex. 1. HWE Hostile work environment created by racist words and when MTD Denied. dog was adopted and named "Huk." See FAC ¶ ¶ 18-20, 25, Ex. 1. 4 Luther Peterson 1-2221 (Blackmon- Discrimination More severely disciplined than white officers. See FAC ¶ 68, MTD Denied. Malloy ) Ex. 10. Received a CP-535 disciplinary action for improper use of his weapon for shooting at an intruder while off-duty in his home. See FAC ¶ 59. Internal investigation resulted in him being disciplined for not having his weapon fully loaded, but he grieved the discipline and it was dismissed. See FAC ¶ 60. Received a CP-550 performance note for not responding to calls regarding the internal investigation even though he was represented by a union representative. See FAC ¶ 61. As a result of the CP-535, he was docked 64 hours. See FAC ¶ 61.

5 Dale Veal 1-2221 (Blackmon- Discrimination Discrimination as a result of being denied overtime Not challenged by Defendant. Malloy ) assignments. See FAC ¶ 37. 6 Richard Webb 1-2221 (Blackmon- HWE Hostile work environment created by racist words. See FAC ¶ MTD Denied. Malloy ) 25, Ex. 1. Discrimination Denied a position with the K-9 Corp in favor of less qualified Not challenged by Defendant. white applicant. FAC ¶ 21. Specific racist word used freely in the K-9 Unit listed. FAC. ¶ 20. Requested Counseling on May 1, 2001 after not being included on the K-9 mini list. FAC ¶ 51.