Blackman v. Stone

Supreme Court

Blackman v. Stone

300 U.S. 641, 57 S. Ct. 514

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 8, 1937

DocketNo. 741

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 300 U.S. 641 (Blackman v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blackman v. Stone, 300 U.S. 641, 57 S. Ct. 514 (1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The decree entered by the District Court composed of three judges under 28 U. S. C. 380 is vacated upon the ground that the cause, so far as relief by injunction is sought, has become moot (Mills v. Green, 159 U. S. 651, 653; Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147, 151, 152; Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U. S. 487, 492; Mahan v. Hume, 287 U. S. 575), but without prejudice to action by the District Court in relation to any matter which may remain' in the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The decree entered by the District Court composed of three judges under 28 U. S. C. 380 is vacated upon the ground that the cause, so far as relief by injunction is sought, has become moot (Mills v. Green, 159 U. S. 651, 653; Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147, 151, 152; Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U. S. 487, 492; Mahan v. Hume, 287 U. S. 575), but without prejudice to action by the District Court in relation to any matter which may remain' in the cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 U.S. 641, 57 S. Ct. 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackman-v-stone-scotus-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack