Blackman v. State

76 Ga. 288
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 27, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 76 Ga. 288 (Blackman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackman v. State, 76 Ga. 288 (Ga. 1886).

Opinion

Blandfokd, Justice.

.Blackman was indicted and found guilty of murder for killiiigof S. J. Tondee, on the 5th of September, 1885. by the superior court of Schley county, at the September term, 1885. of said court. On Wednesday, the court having convened on the fourth Monday of said month, and the grand jury having returned the bill of indictment on Tuesday before, the accused being unable to employ counsel, and at that time confined in the common jail of Sumter county, the court announced that he would take up the case on Friday thereafter, and assigned as counsel for the [289]*289prisoner, B. B. Hinton, J. S. McCorkle and B. H. Wilkinson, Esquires. The counsel asked that the case be' continued, and showed that they were not prepared to go oa with the case, and that the prisoner had only been brought, up for trial from the jail in Sumter county late on Thursday evening before the trial; that they had not been enabled to confer with .him so as to prepare his defence. The court refused this motion, and this refusal is assigned as error.

We think that, under the facts of this case, the court should have granted a postponement of the case, either for the term or to some particular day thereafter. The evidence being circumstantial, his counsel should have been allowed a reasonable time to have prepared the prisoner’s defence. It is quite manifest to us from the facts that the counsel had not had time allowed to prepare the defence. Article 1, section 1, paragraph 5 of the constitution of this state declares that every person charged with an offense against the laws of this state shall have the privilege and benefit of counsel. This constitutional privilege would amount 1 a nothing if the counsel for the accused are not allowed sufficient time to prepare his defence ; it would be a poor boon indeed. This would be to keep the word of promise to our ear and break it. to our hope.”

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crane v. State
670 S.E.2d 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Favors v. State
214 S.E.2d 645 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
State v. Hill
176 S.E.2d 41 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)
Dowda v. State
166 S.E.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Perkins v. State of North Carolina
234 F. Supp. 333 (W.D. North Carolina, 1964)
Fair v. Balkcom
119 S.E.2d 691 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Porch v. Foster
75 S.E.2d 420 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Cartee v. State
69 S.E.2d 827 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
State v. Speller
53 S.E.2d 294 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
State v. . Gibson
50 S.E.2d 520 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Cannady v. State
9 S.E.2d 241 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Avery v. State
188 So. 391 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)
Hulsey v. State
159 S.E. 270 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Sheppard v. State
141 S.E. 196 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Waldrip v. State
130 S.E. 829 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Yates v. State
86 S.E. 783 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Reliford v. State
79 S.E. 1128 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
McArver v. State
40 S.E. 779 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Charlon v. State
32 S.E. 347 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Walton v. State
5 S.E. 203 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Ga. 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackman-v-state-ga-1886.