Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Blackman v. State

Blackman v. State

788 So. 2d 1087, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8046, 2001 WL 649620
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 2001
DocketNo. 4D01-2015
StatusPublished

This text of 788 So. 2d 1087 (Blackman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackman v. State, 788 So. 2d 1087, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8046, 2001 WL 649620 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Daniel J. Blackman seeks prohibition relief asking this court to quash the trial court’s denial of his motion to expunge the record and/or to terminate probation and/or to mitigate or modify sentence. This court has appellate jurisdiction to review only the denial of Blackman’s motion to expunge the record.1 See State v. S.C., [1088]*1088762 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Capuana v. State, 347 So.2d 629 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

We redesignate the petition as a request for appellate review and treat the petition as Blackman’s initial brief. Having reviewed Blackuian’s motion and the transcripts provided, we summarily affirm the trial court’s decision. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.315(a).

WARNER, C.J., GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burgos v. State
765 So. 2d 967 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Capuano v. State
347 So. 2d 629 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Oser v. State
699 So. 2d 844 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
State v. S.C.
762 So. 2d 1008 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
788 So. 2d 1087, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8046, 2001 WL 649620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackman-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.