Blackman v. Marsicano

California Supreme Court

Blackman v. Marsicano

61 Cal. 638, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 681

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 2, 1882

DocketNo. 7,452

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 Cal. 638 (Blackman v. Marsicano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blackman v. Marsicano, 61 Cal. 638, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 681 (Cal. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court :

The claim of lien in this case, in stating the terms, time given, and conditions of the contract, used the words, “ cash upon demand, in gold coin of the United States.” This was a substantial compliance with the requirement of the statute. The case of Hooper v. Flood (54 Cal. 221) presented a statement quite different in effect from that here presented.

Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court :

The claim of lien in this case, in stating the terms, time given, and conditions of the contract, used the words, “ cash upon demand, in gold coin of the United States.” This was a substantial compliance with the requirement of the statute. The case of Hooper v. Flood (54 Cal. 221) presented a statement quite different in effect from that here presented.

Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Cal. 638, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackman-v-marsicano-cal-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack