Blackman v. Barber
This text of 627 S.W.2d 72 (Blackman v. Barber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff Blackman as a home owner and plaintiffs Cheeseman as tenants filed a mul-ti-count petition for injunction and actual and punitive damages. They sued defendants Barber who are owners and operators of an adjoining airport.
The trial court struck parts of plaintiffs’ petition; but it left standing the portions seeking an injunction and also allegations [73]*73of value depreciation of the owner’s land and the tenants’ claim to punitive damages.
Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ appeal on the ground it is premature. We agree because the trial court’s order does not dispose of all the issues and all the parties. Baumstark v. Jordan, 540 S.W.2d 611 [2-4] (Mo.App.1976); Caudle v. Kelley, 545 S.W.2d 427 [2, 3] (Mo.App.1976). The attempted appeal does not meet this test.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
627 S.W.2d 72, 1981 Mo. App. LEXIS 3253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackman-v-barber-moctapp-1981.