Blackman v. Barber

627 S.W.2d 72, 1981 Mo. App. LEXIS 3253
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 22, 1981·No. No. 44401·Published

Opinion

CLEMONS, Senior Judge.

Plaintiff Blackman as a home owner and plaintiffs Cheeseman as tenants filed a mul-ti-count petition for injunction and actual and punitive damages. They sued defendants Barber who are owners and operators of an adjoining airport.

The trial court struck parts of plaintiffs’ petition; but it left standing the portions seeking an injunction and also allegations [73] of value depreciation of the owner’s land and the tenants’ claim to punitive damages.

Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ appeal on the ground it is premature. We agree because the trial court’s order does not dispose of all the issues and all the parties. Baumstark v. Jordan, 540 S.W.2d 611 [2-4] (Mo.App.1976); Caudle v. Kelley, 545 S.W.2d 427 [2, 3] (Mo.App.1976). The attempted appeal does not meet this test.

Dismissed.

REINHARD, P. J., and SNYDER and CRIST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackman v. Barber, 627 S.W.2d 72, 1981 Mo. App. LEXIS 3253 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981).

627 S.W.2d 72 (Blackman v. Barber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caudle v. Kelley
545 S.W.2d 427 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1976)
Baumstark v. Jordan
540 S.W.2d 611 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1976)