Blackman v. Barber

627 S.W.2d 72, 1981 Mo. App. LEXIS 3253
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 22, 1981
DocketNo. 44401
StatusPublished

This text of 627 S.W.2d 72 (Blackman v. Barber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackman v. Barber, 627 S.W.2d 72, 1981 Mo. App. LEXIS 3253 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

CLEMONS, Senior Judge.

Plaintiff Blackman as a home owner and plaintiffs Cheeseman as tenants filed a mul-ti-count petition for injunction and actual and punitive damages. They sued defendants Barber who are owners and operators of an adjoining airport.

The trial court struck parts of plaintiffs’ petition; but it left standing the portions seeking an injunction and also allegations [73]*73of value depreciation of the owner’s land and the tenants’ claim to punitive damages.

Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ appeal on the ground it is premature. We agree because the trial court’s order does not dispose of all the issues and all the parties. Baumstark v. Jordan, 540 S.W.2d 611 [2-4] (Mo.App.1976); Caudle v. Kelley, 545 S.W.2d 427 [2, 3] (Mo.App.1976). The attempted appeal does not meet this test.

Dismissed.

REINHARD, P. J., and SNYDER and CRIST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caudle v. Kelley
545 S.W.2d 427 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1976)
Baumstark v. Jordan
540 S.W.2d 611 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
627 S.W.2d 72, 1981 Mo. App. LEXIS 3253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackman-v-barber-moctapp-1981.