Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co.

Court of Claims

Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co.

217 Ct. Cl. 672, 1978 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 178, 1978 WL 8439

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedJune 22, 1978

DocketNo. 364-74

StatusPublished

This text of 217 Ct. Cl. 672 (Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co., 217 Ct. Cl. 672, 1978 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 178, 1978 WL 8439 (cc 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

This case comes before the court on defendant’s request, filed April 7, 1978, pursuant to Hules 53(c)(2)(i) and 53(c)(3), for review by the court of an order of the trial judge, having been considered, together with plaintiffs’ response and defendant’s supplement, without oral argument. Upon consideration thereof, the court concludes that the trial judge has discretion whether to reopen proof after closing it, if sufficient cause is shown. As he explains in his order, his grounds for refusing to do so here, seem such as a reasonable trial judge might deem decisive. See, generally, General Electric Co. v. United States, 189 Ct. Cl. 116, 416 F. 2d 1320 (1969); Kaiser Aluminum Corp. v. United States, 187 Ct. Cl. 443, 409 F. 2d 238 (1969) (concurring opinion).

it is therefore ordered that defendant’s said request for review, filed April 7, 1978, be and the same is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case comes before the court on defendant’s request, filed April 7, 1978, pursuant to Hules 53(c)(2)(i) and 53(c)(3), for review by the court of an order of the trial judge, having been considered, together with plaintiffs’ response and defendant’s supplement, without oral argument. Upon consideration thereof, the court concludes that the trial judge has discretion whether to reopen proof after closing it, if sufficient cause is shown. As he explains in his order, his grounds for refusing to do so here, seem such as a reasonable trial judge might deem decisive. See, generally, General Electric Co. v. United States, 189 Ct. Cl. 116, 416 F. 2d 1320 (1969); Kaiser Aluminum Corp. v. United States, 187 Ct. Cl. 443, 409 F. 2d 238 (1969) (concurring opinion).

it is therefore ordered that defendant’s said request for review, filed April 7, 1978, be and the same is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 Ct. Cl. 672, 1978 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 178, 1978 WL 8439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackhawk-heating-plumbing-co-cc-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack