Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Blackhall v. State

Blackhall v. State

12 So. 3d 1277, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9797, 2009 WL 2069721
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 17, 2009
DocketNo. 5D08-2757
StatusPublished

This text of 12 So. 3d 1277 (Blackhall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackhall v. State, 12 So. 3d 1277, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9797, 2009 WL 2069721 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, we remand with directions that the trial court enter a written order finding Appellant competent to proceed nunc pro tunc to the date that the trial court made its oral finding of competency. See Smith v. State, 967 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Molina v. State, 946 So.2d 1103, 1105, n. 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

[1278]*1278AFFIRMED and REMANDED with Directions.

SAWAYA, PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
967 So. 2d 1002 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Molina v. State
946 So. 2d 1103 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 So. 3d 1277, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9797, 2009 WL 2069721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackhall-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.