Blackford v. Green

100 A. 1069, 89 N.J.L. 357, 4 Gummere 357, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 322
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 19, 1916·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—Tub Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WlLLTAMS, TAYLOR, JJ. 11.

For reversal—ISTone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackford v. Green, 100 A. 1069, 89 N.J.L. 357, 4 Gummere 357, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 322 (N.J. 1916).

100 A. 1069 (Blackford v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Verra v. Mayor and Council of Hoboken
175 A.2d 665 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Nashville Bridge Co. v. Honeycutt
20 So. 2d 591 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1945)
Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. Norton
96 F.2d 764 (Third Circuit, 1938)