Blackfeet, Jasmine Danielle

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 28, 2022
DocketWR-94,082-01
StatusPublished

This text of Blackfeet, Jasmine Danielle (Blackfeet, Jasmine Danielle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackfeet, Jasmine Danielle, (Tex. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-94,082-01

EX PARTE JASMINE DANIELLE BLACKFEET, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR19-0141-173-A IN THE 173RD DISTRICT COURT FROM HENDERSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant entered an open plea of guilty to aggravated robbery and was sentenced to fifteen

years’ imprisonment. She did not appeal her conviction.1 Applicant filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See

TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that her plea was involuntary because trial counsel promised her that she

would receive probation if she entered an open plea to the trial court. Applicant alleges that she was

1 There is nothing in the record to show whether Applicant was advised of her right to appeal, or whether the trial court certified her right to appeal. 2

asked at arraignment if she wanted to be tried by her tribe2, and that she stated that she did, but that

she did not pursue this issue after trial counsel promised her that she would receive probation if she

entered an open plea to the trial court. Applicant did not receive probation, but was sentenced by

the trial court to fifteen years’ imprisonment.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle her to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S.

52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record

should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM .

PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims.

In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the

trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent her

at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial

court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged

deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

2 Applicant alleges that she is Native American. 3

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: September 28, 2022 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Lockhart
474 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Ex parte Argent
393 S.W.3d 781 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Blackfeet, Jasmine Danielle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackfeet-jasmine-danielle-texcrimapp-2022.