Blackerby v. People ex rel. Metz

Illinois Supreme Court

Blackerby v. People ex rel. Metz

10 Ill. 266

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1848

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 Ill. 266 (Blackerby v. People ex rel. Metz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blackerby v. People ex rel. Metz, 10 Ill. 266 (Ill. 1848).

Pincite

Opinion

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Treat, C. J.

The Circuit Court awarded a peremptory mandamus against the County Commissioners of Pike county, to compel them to make an order on the county treasurer for the payment of $125 to B. B. Metz. The Commissioners presented a copy of the record to one of the Justices of the Supreme Court, and obtained an order for a supersedeas on their entering into bond. The bond was executed and filed in the Circuit Court, but the record has never been filed in this Court, nor has a writ of error been sued out. The counsel for Metz, on the supposition that the case is pending in this Court, has entered a motion to; dismiss it for want of prosecution. The motion cannot be entertained. The case is not before this Court. The judgment of the Circuit Court is not superseded, but process can at any moment issue to enforce it. A writ of error must be sued out before the ease can be considered as pending in this Court. The order allowing a supersedeas does not operate as a suspension of the judgment, until the bond is filed and the writ of error issues. Rev. Stat. 421, § 54. The bond must be filed with the Clerk of this Court. Rule 5, 1 Scam. 12. When these proceedings are had, the Clerk issues the certificate prescribed by the’6th rule of this Court, the object of which is to notify those interested that all proceedings on the judgment are to be stayed until the determination of the writ of error.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Treat, C. J.

The Circuit Court awarded a peremptory mandamus against the County Commissioners of Pike county, to compel them to make an order on the county treasurer for the payment of $125 to B. B. Metz. The Commissioners presented a copy of the record to one of the Justices of the Supreme Court, and obtained an order for a supersedeas on their entering into bond. The bond was executed and filed in the Circuit Court, but the record has never been filed in this Court, nor has a writ of error been sued out. The counsel for Metz, on the supposition that the case is pending in this Court, has entered a motion to; dismiss it for want of prosecution. The motion cannot be entertained. The case is not before this Court. The judgment of the Circuit Court is not superseded, but process can at any moment issue to enforce it. A writ of error must be sued out before the ease can be considered as pending in this Court. The order allowing a supersedeas does not operate as a suspension of the judgment, until the bond is filed and the writ of error issues. Rev. Stat. 421, § 54. The bond must be filed with the Clerk of this Court. Rule 5, 1 Scam. 12. When these proceedings are had, the Clerk issues the certificate prescribed by the’6th rule of this Court, the object of which is to notify those interested that all proceedings on the judgment are to be stayed until the determination of the writ of error.

Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Ill. 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackerby-v-people-ex-rel-metz-ill-1848.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack