Blackcloud v. State

2019 ND 148, 929 N.W.2d 539
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJune 27, 2019
Docket20190029
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 ND 148 (Blackcloud v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackcloud v. State, 2019 ND 148, 929 N.W.2d 539 (N.D. 2019).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Martin Blackcloud, also known as Martin Black Cloud, appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Blackcloud's conviction for gross sexual imposition was affirmed in State v. Blackcloud , 2015 ND 108 , 865 N.W.2d 124 . On this appeal Blackcloud argues the district court erred in denying his application for post-conviction *540 relief. The application alleged newly discovered evidence exists which would impeach the trial testimony and show Blackcloud did not engage in the charged conduct. The district court conducted an evidentiary hearing and denied Blackcloud's application.

[¶2] The district court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, and evidence supports the district court's finding the evidence was not newly discovered and would not result in an acquittal. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mesch v. Levi
2015 ND 86 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2015)
State v. Blackcloud
2015 ND 108 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 ND 148, 929 N.W.2d 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackcloud-v-state-nd-2019.