Blackburn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Blackburn v. State

1924 OK CR 66, 224 P. 208, 26 Okla. Crim. 268, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 86

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 4, 1924

DocketNo. A-4237.

StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK CR 66 (Blackburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blackburn v. State, 1924 OK CR 66, 224 P. 208, 26 Okla. Crim. 268, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 86 (Okla. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 14th day of December, 1921, plaintiff in error was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and serve 30 days in the county jail for the unlawful possession of whisky. Plaintiff in error was given 60 days in which to prepare and serve a case-made, and 90 days in which to file his appeal in this court. The appeal was filed in this court on March 8, 1922. The Attorney General, on November 15, 1923, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that no notice of appeal was served on the court clerk and county attorney of Caddo county, as required by law. "While the case-made does not contain a notice of appeal, other files in the clerk’s office show that the notice was served on the proper officers on March 6th and filed in this court on March 8, 1922.

The motion to dismiss is therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the 14th day of December, 1921, plaintiff in error was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and serve 30 days in the county jail for the unlawful possession of whisky. Plaintiff in error was given 60 days in which to prepare and serve a case-made, and 90 days in which to file his appeal in this court. The appeal was filed in this court on March 8, 1922. The Attorney General, on November 15, 1923, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that no notice of appeal was served on the court clerk and county attorney of Caddo county, as required by law. "While the case-made does not contain a notice of appeal, other files in the clerk’s office show that the notice was served on the proper officers on March 6th and filed in this court on March 8, 1922.

The motion to dismiss is therefore overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1924 OK CR 66, 224 P. 208, 26 Okla. Crim. 268, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackburn-v-state-oklacrimapp-1924.