Blackburn v. State

502 S.W.3d 88, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1115, 2016 WL 6440398
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 2016·No. No. ED104250·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Giordanio A. Blackburn appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackburn v. State, 502 S.W.3d 88, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1115, 2016 WL 6440398 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

502 S.W.3d 88 (Blackburn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blackburn v. Griffith
E.D. Missouri, 2020