Blackburn v. South Carolina

404 F. App'x 810
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2010·No. No. 09-6677·Published·Cited by 24 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard E. Blackburn appeals the district court’s order adopting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Blackburn’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blackburn v. South Carolina, No. 9:06-cv-02011-PMD, 2009 WL 632542 (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackburn v. South Carolina, 404 F. App'x 810 (4th Cir. 2010).

404 F. App'x 810 (Blackburn v. South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dontell v. Rhodes
D. South Carolina, 2024
Brown v. Jamison
D. Maryland, 2024
Bridgeford v. MCI-J
D. Maryland, 2023
Brewer v. Earwin
D. Maryland, 2023
Bland v. Stitley
D. Maryland, 2023
Leupolu v. Dr. Okoluku
D. Maryland, 2022
Mahammend v. Watts
D. Maryland, 2022
Cannon v. Smith
D. Maryland, 2022
Pratt-El v. Gang, Warden
D. Maryland, 2022
Hand v. Allen
D. Maryland, 2022
Neale v. Hogan
D. Maryland, 2021
Bridgeford v. Armstead
D. Maryland, 2021
Hope v. Ritchie
D. Maryland, 2021
Epps v. Zeigler
D. Maryland, 2020
LEWIS v. HOKE COUNTY
M.D. North Carolina, 2020
Ervin v. Corizon Health
D. Maryland, 2020
Conaway v. Carr
D. Maryland, 2019