Blackburn v. Lee

80 S.E. 995, 141 Ga. 310, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 187
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Blackburn v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 Ga. 265
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 18, 1914·Published

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

The issues in the ease under review were the same as those on a former trial of the same case reviewed in Blackburn v. Lee, 137 Ga. 265 (73 S. E. 1), and the case on the last trial was tried in accordance with the .views of this court as expressed in the ease cited.

There was no merit in the assignments of 'error in the motion for new trial on the exclusion of evidence, or on excerpts from the charge to the jury, or on the failure to instruct them, in the absence of requests, as in-, dicated in the motion.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackburn v. Lee, 80 S.E. 995, 141 Ga. 310, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 187 (Ga. 1914).

80 S.E. 995 (Blackburn v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blackburn v. Lee
73 S.E. 1 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)