Blackburn v. Dudley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Blackburn v. Dudley

399 S.E.2d 592, 303 S.C. 169, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 200

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 29, 1990·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Due to inconsistencies between the record and statements by the attorneys as to the verdict returned and the resulting consequences, it is the opinion of this Court that justice requires the vacating of the trial of this matter in the circuit court and of the opinion of the Court of Appeals found at Blackburn & Co., Inc. v. Dudley, 298 S.C. 538, 381 S.E. (2d) 918 (Ct. App. 1989). We remand the matter to the circuit court for a new trial de novo with the right for all parties to amend their pleadings. The case shall be restored to a place of priority on the trial roster.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Due to inconsistencies between the record and statements by the attorneys as to the verdict returned and the resulting consequences, it is the opinion of this Court that justice requires the vacating of the trial of this matter in the circuit court and of the opinion of the Court of Appeals found at Blackburn & Co., Inc. v. Dudley, 298 S.C. 538, 381 S.E. (2d) 918 (Ct. App. 1989). We remand the matter to the circuit court for a new trial de novo with the right for all parties to amend their pleadings. The case shall be restored to a place of priority on the trial roster.

It is so ordered.

Blackburn v. Dudley, 399 S.E.2d 592, 303 S.C. 169, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 200 (S.C. 1990).

Pincite

399 S.E.2d 592 (Blackburn v. Dudley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related