Blackburn Construction Co. v. Kennedy

1933 OK 451, 24 P.2d 1011, 165 Okla. 66, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 250
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 12, 1933
Docket24547
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1933 OK 451 (Blackburn Construction Co. v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackburn Construction Co. v. Kennedy, 1933 OK 451, 24 P.2d 1011, 165 Okla. 66, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 250 (Okla. 1933).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This original proceeding was filed herein March 27, 1933.

On the 17th day of July, after the brief of petitioners had been filed raising only the assignment of error that there was no evidence to support the award made by the Commission, and alleging error because the Industrial Commission should have sustained the. petitioners’ motion to discontinue the compensation for temporary total disability, and in said confession'of error the following language is used;

“Comes now the respondent T. D. Kennedy, in the above numbered and entitled cause, and admits that the evidence taken before the Industrial Commission does not support the order and award made by the Commission in that the evidence is conclusive that the healing period had ended and compensation for temporary disability should have been terminated. Respondent, Kennedy, therefore, confesses error in the order made and requests that the cause be re*-manded to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings therein.”

In the only assignment of error raised by the petitioners, the following language is used:

“Therefore, the Industrial Commission should have sustained the petitioners’ motion to discontinue compensation for temporary total disability, and if the Commission was of the opinion that the claimant had any permanent disability, or if the claimant’s attorney requested the Commission to do so, the claim should have been set for hearing on permanent disability.”

Upon such statement in the assignment of error and upon the confession of error filed herein, the proceeding is reversed and remanded to the Industrial Commission, with directions to vacate the award heretofore made.

This opinion is without prejudice to the right of the Commission to proceed further in this matter in the manner provided by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southwestern Brewing Corp. v. Cothrum
1938 OK 607 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1933 OK 451, 24 P.2d 1011, 165 Okla. 66, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackburn-construction-co-v-kennedy-okla-1933.