Blackbird Tech LLC v. Argento SC By Sicura, Inc.
This text of Blackbird Tech LLC v. Argento SC By Sicura, Inc. (Blackbird Tech LLC v. Argento SC By Sicura, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
BLACKBIRD TECH LLC d/b/a BLACKBIRD : TECHNOLOGIES, : Plaintiff, : 21-CV-11018 (VSB) -against- : ORDER ARGENTO SC BY SICURA INC., : Defendant. :
VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: On April 1, 2022, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss in part the original complaint filed in this action. (Doc. 15.) On April 11, 2022, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (‘FAC’). (Doc. 12.) When a plaintiff amends the operative complaint “after a defendant has filed a motion to dismiss that is still pending, the district court has the option of either denying the pending motion as moot or evaluating the motion in light of the facts alleged in the amended complaint.” Pettaway v. Nat’! Recovery Sols., LLC, 955 F.3d 299, 304 (2d Cir. 2020). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that by May 9, 2022, Defendant shall file either (1) a letter stating that it wishes me to consider its pending motion to dismiss as one to dismiss the FAC; or (ii) an answer or motion to dismiss specifically in response to the FAC. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 25, 2022 i ust 0 _ { » New York, New York MUO JAIQKY iba VERNON S. BRODERICK United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Blackbird Tech LLC v. Argento SC By Sicura, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackbird-tech-llc-v-argento-sc-by-sicura-inc-nysd-2022.