Black v. Winston

127 S.E. 624, 33 Ga. App. 696, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 691
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 15, 1925
Docket16180
StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.E. 624 (Black v. Winston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. Winston, 127 S.E. 624, 33 Ga. App. 696, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 691 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. Under all the facts of the case, as disclosed by the record, the overruling of the certiorari was not error.

2. This court not being satisfied that the writ of error was prosecuted for the purpose of delay only, the request of the defendant in error for the award of damages is denied.

Judgment affirmed,

hulee and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 S.E. 624, 33 Ga. App. 696, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-winston-gactapp-1925.