Black v. Watson

952 N.E.2d 1059, 17 N.Y.3d 747, 929 N.Y.S.2d 66, 2011 NY Slip Op 74706, 2011 N.Y. LEXIS 1400
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 2011·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Family Court’s order as adjudged that respondent did not willfully violate a prior order of the court, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the [748] proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black v. Watson, 952 N.E.2d 1059, 17 N.Y.3d 747, 929 N.Y.S.2d 66, 2011 NY Slip Op 74706, 2011 N.Y. LEXIS 1400 (N.Y. 2011).

952 N.E.2d 1059 (Black v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PERRY, WILLIAM v. RENDER, MELVIN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Perry v. Render
107 A.D.3d 1615 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
CONSILIO, CARYN A. v. TERRIGINO, CHRISTOPHER
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
Consilio v. Terrigino
96 A.D.3d 1424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
FOX, JAMES M. v. FOX, ELAINE H.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
Fox v. Fox
93 A.D.3d 1224 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)